After losing cognitive function behind the wheel, drivers are striking trees and veering into head-on collisions. What’s to prevent vaccidents from happening in the sky with hundreds of passengers on board?
The camera doesn’t lie: post-jab behavior is not always pretty and may be fatal. We’ve seen videos of nurses, members of parliament, economic leaders, and small plane pilots plummeting to their deaths minutes after getting vaxxed.
Just last week, Austrian MP Eva Holzleitner collapsed in the middle of a parliamentary session, explaining on Instagram she’d just been vaccinated. True to her father of lies, Eva concluded by gaslighting the peons and saving corporate sponsorship: “vaccine skepticism is unfounded.”
Although thousands of pilots refuse to participate in the state’s latest medical test program, hundreds are caving to save their jobs. What assurances do passengers have that “vaccidents” on land won’t happen in the air?
If You Have the Fish, I’ll Have the Chicken
There used to be a rule: if one pilot had the fish, the other had the chicken. It was a simple way to assure that food poisoning affecting one pilot would not affect the other. Someone would be able to fly and land the plane.
If You Take the Jab, I’ll Take Nutraceuticals?
Could the Fish or Chicken rule be brought to bear on gene therapeutics being forced into the bodies of pilots?
Of course, it could. Pilots are trusted with hundreds of lives on every trip. Why can’t they be trusted to choose what’s injected into their bodies?
Between the gate-rape, carcinogenic screening, pedophilic x-rays, and steward-Karens going apoplectic when a mask slips past a nose during an 8-hour flight, there are plenty of reasons not to fly.
Add pilot vaccidents to the list.
While you’re at it, go ahead and add Air Traffic Control, too.
